Kiran Jonnalagadda ([info]jace) wrote,
@ 2006-09-05 23:03:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Moving up in life
When you’re young and hungry, you’re naturally jealous of the high flying. Not the celebrities you read about in the papers, for they’re inaccessible, but the folks a few notches up the social ladder, far enough up to visibly afford a lifestyle you can’t, yet not so far up that they don’t bother telling you about it, to which you nod and hum and say “oh” and “nice” before wandering off to a reverie.

One day you too will be able to afford a car. You too will travel around the world and live in a beautiful, big house. You too will build a business empire and have attendants waiting for your orders, and genuinely be too busy for someone. And then you’ll stand up to those show-offs and look them in the eye.

Then you grow up and the economy booms and one by one, those dreams become reality. And yet, somehow, they don’t feel like a big deal. Those folks you’re preening at don’t even notice. You’re neither great nor eccentric. You’re just “normal”. It’s the worst response you could have anticipated. You look at your finances and see how much of your substantial earning is being eaten up by your substantial lifestyle and how little you’re saving. Makes you wonder. Are you actually achieving something remarkable, or is it just that the economy has changed and brought it within your reach, to which you’re responding like a reckless spendthrift? Friends point out the same and make you feel worse for yourself.

But you know what? It was worth it. It did wonders for your self-esteem. It took you out from being Mr “oh, but I’m not good enough” to being normal. And for others seeking inspiration, you’re a hero.

There are greater dreams unfulfilled. You’re now a person of the world. Go for them.



(31 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]deelight
2006-09-05 05:36 pm UTC (link)
Nice. Well expressed...really liked this post.

(Reply to this)


[info]jbritto
2006-09-05 08:59 pm UTC (link)
How true. I can identify very much with the part that it doesn't feel like a big deal.

(Reply to this)


[info]deponti
2006-09-06 12:55 am UTC (link)
the rainbow keeps shifting, doesn't it? Liked the post very much.

(Reply to this)

Now, that's something I can identify with
[info]frozenaftermath
2006-09-06 04:05 am UTC (link)
Cars, biz empire, okay. But, attendants waiting for your orders? Already?!

In the past year I've gradually given up on the 'setting-up-something-of-your -own' thing. From the acquisitions we've made, what I've seen is that not many of these little ops gets the founders much of a net gain from the sell off, even without putting a figure on the effort/dedication and love you have put into the set up, mostly because people are earning well in regular jobs in big cos that are easily better, especially if you consider the reduced risks.

On the other hand, I think most of us would end up on the hippie trail, having cashed in the stock options and the rest of the stash in MFs, by the time the mid thirties hit us.

What I really wanted to say though was, well written :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Now, that's something I can identify with
[info]jace
2006-09-06 10:08 am UTC (link)
Not all examples were personal. Some were observed in other people. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]mona1610
2006-09-06 04:23 am UTC (link)
nice post that. it reminds me of this play i'd seen a while ago. one of the characters ( a social butterfly) laments on something to the effect: "We no longer seek contentment in our lives, we seek multiple orgasms: at work, at home, at play, at our childrens' annual day functions too."

It takes time to know that the rat race doesn't begin at one source, nor does it end anywhere, whats more, it doesn't even run in the same alley all the time.

Luckily, I met someone a few years ago who planted my roots in the right place. Now I don't get lost soaring high!

(Reply to this)


[info]udhay
2006-09-06 05:02 am UTC (link)
Success is when you're bored by the people who used to ignore you.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]latelyontime
2006-09-06 07:14 am UTC (link)
me likes that....

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]birdonthewire
2006-09-06 07:19 am UTC (link)
ditto...

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]twistedlogix
2006-09-06 09:12 am UTC (link)
Cool!
Did you make that up?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]udhay
2006-09-06 09:47 am UTC (link)
No, I think a version of it was due to Nancy Astor.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]jace
2006-09-06 10:08 am UTC (link)
That is so utterly brilliant.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]tsk1979
2006-09-06 05:19 am UTC (link)
Only when I get there I can really comment upon how it feels, right now its always like.. Wanting a little more.
I know I am also a hero to some, who have just started, but then you always look up and aspire to be there.
I wasnt like that a long time back.
Whenever my parents used to tell me you came 10th in the class, I used to feel happy that I was above 40 odd students.
In college I was in the top five, from the bottom, and this thing never ever troubled me. Maybe because I felt the bottom rung of the class is such a fun place to be. No expectations, the teachers leave you alone and it is a well known fact that the bottom rung enjoys more!
No in the job though. Here there is always a gnawing desire to excel, to be the best, to get the best hike.

(Reply to this)


[info]mannu
2006-09-06 06:30 am UTC (link)
I feel like somehow my thoughts have entered your head. Very well-expressed!

(Reply to this)


[info]latelyontime
2006-09-06 07:13 am UTC (link)
hmmm but what happens if your parameters of success are not economic in nature?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]chandrahasa
2006-09-06 07:23 am UTC (link)
And most often they are not... What if they are not physical in nature at all?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]jace
2006-09-06 10:10 am UTC (link)
That wasn't meant to be a parameter, just an example. Economic cost of achieving current dreams == no finances for the others you've been conditioned to want to achieve.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]mona1610
2006-09-06 10:16 am UTC (link)
i'm thinking, wouldn't it be the case no matter what scale you choose? there's always a higher high to achieve, and there's usually someone perched on that rung above you.. being your hero, inspiring you to be better and move higher?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]code_martial
2006-09-06 10:34 am UTC (link)
Weird, but I was wondering about something similar at about the same time today. I came up with my own mental model of macro-economics.

Essentially, your mission is to gather a little bit of a lot of things you want or need to live. You do this by producing a lot of something that many others need. The money you get by selling that thing is like an entitlement to gather other things -- and prioritise you over others for things in limited supply.

As long as you're able to sell, you're able to buy too. Crucially, the level of your richness is not measured by how much money you get but by how much purchasing power you have. E.g. a person earning $1000 in Delhi is way richer than a person earning $1000 in London.

Is it possible for everyone to get rich? Yes, it is. If everyone can produce stuff in large quantities, acquiring things becomes easier for everyone else.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]frozenaftermath
2006-09-06 12:24 pm UTC (link)
If everyone can produce stuff in large quantities, acquiring things becomes easier for everyone else.

A million souls (dead and alive) at the London School of Economics let out a collective shriek of outrage on reading that statement.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]code_martial
2006-09-06 06:13 pm UTC (link)
Why?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]manubhardwaj
2006-09-06 08:28 pm UTC (link)
I guess because infinite supply equates to a world without possibilities for profit, and consequently to the end of the concept of money. Heh.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]frozenaftermath
2006-09-07 08:40 am UTC (link)
Touche.

More than profit, it kills the concept of value, relative and absolute, that is mostly related to how scarce a commodity is.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]code_martial
2006-09-08 10:14 am UTC (link)
No, it doesn't. Reduction in scarcity is not the same as elimination of scarcity. Ditto holds for value. I didn't say that everyone can produce the same kind of product with the same levels of quality or value. If nothing else, there'd be a differentiating human factor.

Also, there are some things that are designed to be exclusive (IOW, scarce). Medals in sports are by definition scarce and need to be competed for with skills. Similarly, producing "limited edition" articles is an established practice. The reputation of the sporting event or producer of the article determines the premium that they can place on such exclusive articles.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

I have that circular motion feeling again...
[info]frozenaftermath
2006-09-08 02:51 pm UTC (link)
If everyone can produce stuff in large quantities, you'd be doing precisely that - elimination of scarcity. Even otherwise, taking into consideration your assertion that everyone can produce in varying quality/value, the basic premise is flawed. Me making oodles of crappy cars would help me acquiring nothing, because nobody would want it. Just because I can make it does not necessarily mean the world+dog would want it. On the other hand, me making oodles of super sexy cars would land me, incrementally with lesser and lesser stuff, because, as you said, a lot value is a direct attribute of exclusivity (scarcity in other words, be it even artificial).

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: I have that circular motion feeling again...
[info]code_martial
2006-09-08 05:20 pm UTC (link)
I'm not an economist but isn't it correct that a country's prosperity is measured by its GDP?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: I have that circular motion feeling again...
[info]frozenaftermath
2006-09-09 05:41 am UTC (link)
I am an economics grad, but that did nothing more than convince me for life that most in that line are interested in not much else but getting multiple Os from doing dy/dx over and over again. It is disgusting to the point that save a certain Mr Sen, any mention of welfare economics is sneered at in the community. With numbers you can prove/disprove anything and every thing. And GDP alone is not a measure of how well a country is doing, there are other things like the HDI ranking etc, that at least try to quantify the unquantifiable - the quality of living. But I will admit that it's been ages since I've been near anything related to eco, so things might have changed by now :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]code_martial
2006-09-08 07:06 am UTC (link)
The "can" in "can produce" accounted for the feasibility and profitability of production.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]rishiseth
2006-09-06 03:50 pm UTC (link)
Nicely put, Jace. Holds a lot of resonance.

(Reply to this)


[info]vijucat
2006-09-15 04:07 pm UTC (link)
"I know exactly what I don't want at any point in life, and it's what I already have".
:-)

(Reply to this)

few words
[info]plasmid
2006-09-20 08:57 pm UTC (link)
i've a few lines for this whole discussion...
a. More you get more you want..this is root of all our troubles
b. Wants are UNLIMITED but means are limited.
c. You can't get something for nothing
d. You alwasy get less than you pay for
e. Satisfaction is UNATTAINABLE till you have a LAST ride
so this world (and you-as a part of it) will keep on accumulating things thinking that they havn't accumulated enough and this will continue till eternity :)

(Reply to this)


(31 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…